Comparative analysis of prevention and control measures toward COVID-19 epidemic between Shanghai and Beijing.

Purpose: By serving and providing a guide for other regional places, this study aims to advance and guide the epidemic prevention and control methods, and practices and strengthen people's ability to respond to COVID-19 and other future potential public health risks. Design/methodology/approach: A comparative analysis was conducted that the COVID-19 epidemic development trend and prevention and control effects both in Beijing and Shanghai. In fact, regarding the COVID-19 policy and strategic areas, the differences between governmental, social, and professional management were discussed and explored. To prevent and be ready for potential pandemics, experience and knowledge were used and summarized. Findings: The strong attack of the Omicron variant in early 2022 has posed challenges to epidemic prevention and control practices in many Chinese cities. Shanghai, which had achieved relatively good performance in the fight against the epidemic, has exposed limitations in its epidemic prevention and control system in the face of Omicron. In fact, the city of Beijing has undertaken prompt and severe lockdown measures and achieved rather good results in epidemic prevention and control because of learning from Shanghai's experience and lessons; adhering to the overall concept of "dynamic clearing," implementing precise prevention and monitoring, enhancing community control, and making emergency plans and preparations. All these actions and measures are still essential in the shift from pandemic response to pandemic control. Research limitations/implications: Different places have introduced different urgent policies to control the spread of the pandemic. Strategies to control COVID-19 have often been based on preliminary and limited data and have tended to be slow to evolve as new evidence emerges. Hence, the effects of these anti-epidemic policies need to be further tested.

Analysis of Interaction Network Between Host Protein and M Protein of Swine Acute Diarrhea Syndrome Coronavirus.

Swine acute diarrhea syndrome coronavirus (SADS-CoV) is an enterovirus that can cause acute diarrhea and death in piglets and cause serious economic losses to the pig industry. SADS-CoV membrane (M) protein mainly plays a key role in biological processes, such as virus assembly, budding, and host innate immune regulation. Understanding the interaction between M protein and host proteins is very important to define the molecular mechanism of cells at the protein level and to understand specific cellular physiological pathways. In this study, 289 host proteins interacting with M protein were identified by glutathione-S-transferase (GST) pull-down combined with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was established by Gene Ontology (GO) terms and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Gene and Genomes (KEGG) pathways analysis. Results showed that SADS-CoV M protein was mainly associated with the host metabolism, signal transduction, and innate immunity. The Co-Immunoprecipitation (CO-IP) validation results of six randomly selected proteins, namely, Rab11b, voltage-dependent anion-selective channel 1 (VDAC1), Ribosomal Protein L18 (RPL18), RALY, Ras Homolog Family Member A (RHOA), and Annexin A2 (ANXA2), were consistent with LC-MS results. In addition, overexpression of RPL18 and PHOA significantly promoted SADS-CoV replication, while overexpression of RALY antagonized viral replication. This work will help to clarify the function of SADS-CoV M protein in the life cycle of SADS-CoV.

Swine acute diarrhea syndrome coronavirus (SADS-CoV) antagonizes interferon-ß production via blocking IPS-1 and RIG-I.

Swine acute diarrhea syndrome coronavirus (SADS-CoV), a newly emerging enteric coronavirus, is considered to be associated with swine acute diarrhea syndrome (SADS) which has caused significantly economic losses to the porcine industry. Interactions between SADS-CoV and the host innate immune response is unclear yet. In this study, we used IPEC-J2 cells as a model to explore potential evasion strategies employed by SADS-CoV. Our results showed that SADS-CoV infection failed to induce IFN-ß production, and inhibited poly (I:C) and Sendai virus (SeV)-triggered IFN-ß expression. SADS-CoV also blocked poly (I:C)-induced phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of IRF-3 and NF-κB. Furthermore, SADS-CoV did not interfere with the activity of IFN-ß promoter stimulated by IRF3, TBK1 and IKKε, but counteracted its activation induced by IPS-1 and RIG-I. Collectively, this study is the first investigation that shows interactions between SADS-CoV and the host innate immunity, which provides information of the molecular mechanisms underlying SASD-CoV infection.